Review





Similar Products

95
MedChemExpress ac devd cho
( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, <t>Ac-DEVD-CHO,</t> or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.
Ac Devd Cho, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/Ac-DEVD-CHO/pmc13626044-427-4-10
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ac devd cho - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Implantcast GmbH total knee endoprosthesis (acs® system
( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, <t>Ac-DEVD-CHO,</t> or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.
Total Knee Endoprosthesis (Acs® System, supplied by Implantcast GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/total+knee+endoprosthesis++acs++system/nct04701359-2-28-32
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
total knee endoprosthesis (acs® system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Toyobo revertra ace qpcr rt kit
( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, <t>Ac-DEVD-CHO,</t> or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.
Revertra Ace Qpcr Rt Kit, supplied by Toyobo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/ReverTra+Ace+qPCR+RT+Kit/custom%40fsq-101%4042541307
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
revertra ace qpcr rt kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Toyobo revertra ace qpcr rt master mix with gdna remover
( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, <t>Ac-DEVD-CHO,</t> or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.
Revertra Ace Qpcr Rt Master Mix With Gdna Remover, supplied by Toyobo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/ReverTra+Ace+qPCR+RT+Master+Mix+with+gDNA+Remover/custom%40fsq-301%4042780923
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
revertra ace qpcr rt master mix with gdna remover - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher microplate reader
( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, <t>Ac-DEVD-CHO,</t> or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.
Microplate Reader, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/Bovine+Serum+Albumin/pmc13320252-61-8-12
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microplate reader - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher bovine serum albumin
( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, <t>Ac-DEVD-CHO,</t> or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.
Bovine Serum Albumin, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/Bovine+Serum+Albumin/pmc13280126-109-46-50
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bovine serum albumin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Toyobo revertra ace qpcr rt master mix
Transcriptome analyses of livers and hepatocytes following YAP induction by AAV or HTVi. (a) Schematic overview of the RNA‐seq workflow for whole liver RNA‐seq (left) and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq (right). For sorted RNA‐seq, hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase perfusion and hepatocyte fractionation, followed by purification of live hepatocytes and FACS sorting of tdTomato‐positive hepatocytes. Liver tissues or sorted hepatocytes were collected 3 days after YAP induction and subjected to RNA‐seq analysis. (b) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of whole liver RNA‐seq data using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (c) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in whole liver RNA‐seq. (d) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq data using DEGs across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (e) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq. (f) Venn diagram showing the overlap of HTVi‐specifically upregulated genes between whole RNA‐seq analysis and sort RNA‐seq analysis. (g) Reactome pathway analysis of genes commonly upregulated in the HTVi‐YAP group in both whole liver and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq datasets. The x ‐axis indicates −log10 (adjusted p value), dot size represents gene count, and color intensity indicates z‐score. (h–j) <t>qPCR</t> validation of representative genes associated with the indicated Reactome pathway terms: Cell cycle checkpoints (h), RHO GTPase effectors (i), and Immunoregulatory interactions between a lymphoid and a nonlymphoid cell (j). Relative mRNA expression was normalized to Gapdh . Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3).
Revertra Ace Qpcr Rt Master Mix, supplied by Toyobo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/ReverTra+Ace+qPCR+RT+Kit/pmc13635467-179-4-10
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
revertra ace qpcr rt master mix - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal igg antibody conjugated agarose at 4 ◦c for 24 h normal immunoglobulin igg conjugated agarose was used as a negative control
Transcriptome analyses of livers and hepatocytes following YAP induction by AAV or HTVi. (a) Schematic overview of the RNA‐seq workflow for whole liver RNA‐seq (left) and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq (right). For sorted RNA‐seq, hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase perfusion and hepatocyte fractionation, followed by purification of live hepatocytes and FACS sorting of tdTomato‐positive hepatocytes. Liver tissues or sorted hepatocytes were collected 3 days after YAP induction and subjected to RNA‐seq analysis. (b) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of whole liver RNA‐seq data using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (c) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in whole liver RNA‐seq. (d) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq data using DEGs across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (e) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq. (f) Venn diagram showing the overlap of HTVi‐specifically upregulated genes between whole RNA‐seq analysis and sort RNA‐seq analysis. (g) Reactome pathway analysis of genes commonly upregulated in the HTVi‐YAP group in both whole liver and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq datasets. The x ‐axis indicates −log10 (adjusted p value), dot size represents gene count, and color intensity indicates z‐score. (h–j) <t>qPCR</t> validation of representative genes associated with the indicated Reactome pathway terms: Cell cycle checkpoints (h), RHO GTPase effectors (i), and Immunoregulatory interactions between a lymphoid and a nonlymphoid cell (j). Relative mRNA expression was normalized to Gapdh . Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3).
Mouse Monoclonal Igg Antibody Conjugated Agarose At 4 ◦C For 24 H Normal Immunoglobulin Igg Conjugated Agarose Was Used As A Negative Control, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ac/normal+mouse+IgG-AC/pm42826720-369-44-65
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal igg antibody conjugated agarose at 4 ◦c for 24 h normal immunoglobulin igg conjugated agarose was used as a negative control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, Ac-DEVD-CHO, or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Chemo-metallo nanodrivers for spatiotemporally controlled in situ vaccination

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aee4577

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MFC cells (Control versus DDP + Zn 2+ ). ( B ) KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs. ( C ) Quantification of extracellular dsDNA. ( D ) JC-1 staining assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. ( E ) γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( F ) ASC speck colocalization with AIM2, Caspase-1, Caspase-8, and RIPK1. Scale bars, 5 μm (overview) and 1 μm (enlarged). ( G ) Western blot analysis of necroptosis markers (RIPK1, p-RIPK1, MLKL, and p-MLKL) and PANoptosis-related proteins (AIM2 and ZBP1). ( H ) Western blot analysis of apoptosis executors (Caspase-8, Caspase-3, and cleaved forms). ( I ) Western blot analysis of pyroptosis markers (Caspase-1, GSDMD, and cleaved forms). ( J ) Cell viability after DDP + Zn 2+ combined with VX-765, Ac-DEVD-CHO, or Nec-1. ( K ) PANoptosis-related proteins in si AIM2 cells. ( L and M ) cGAS activity (L) and expression (M) under Zn 2+ treatment. ( N ) Violin plot of cGAS expression. ( O ) Western blot analysis of STING pathway (STING, p-STING, TBK1, p-TBK1, IRF3, and p-IRF3). ( P ) CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration. ( Q ) BMDC maturation (CD80 + CD86 + ) after different treatments. ( R ) Schematic of the DDP + Zn 2+ –induced ICD. Data in (C), (J), and (L) are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis for (C), (J), (L), (N), and (P) used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. (R) was created in BioRender. Fei, G. (2026) https://BioRender.com/8ri399r . * P < 0.05.

Article Snippet: The pharmacological inhibitors VX-765, Ac-DEVD-CHO, and Nec-1 were purchased from MedChemExpress (USA).

Techniques: Control, Staining, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Immunofluorescence, Western Blot, Analysis, Activity Assay, Expressing, Immune Cell, Two Tailed Test

Transcriptome analyses of livers and hepatocytes following YAP induction by AAV or HTVi. (a) Schematic overview of the RNA‐seq workflow for whole liver RNA‐seq (left) and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq (right). For sorted RNA‐seq, hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase perfusion and hepatocyte fractionation, followed by purification of live hepatocytes and FACS sorting of tdTomato‐positive hepatocytes. Liver tissues or sorted hepatocytes were collected 3 days after YAP induction and subjected to RNA‐seq analysis. (b) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of whole liver RNA‐seq data using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (c) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in whole liver RNA‐seq. (d) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq data using DEGs across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (e) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq. (f) Venn diagram showing the overlap of HTVi‐specifically upregulated genes between whole RNA‐seq analysis and sort RNA‐seq analysis. (g) Reactome pathway analysis of genes commonly upregulated in the HTVi‐YAP group in both whole liver and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq datasets. The x ‐axis indicates −log10 (adjusted p value), dot size represents gene count, and color intensity indicates z‐score. (h–j) qPCR validation of representative genes associated with the indicated Reactome pathway terms: Cell cycle checkpoints (h), RHO GTPase effectors (i), and Immunoregulatory interactions between a lymphoid and a nonlymphoid cell (j). Relative mRNA expression was normalized to Gapdh . Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3).

Journal: Genes to Cells

Article Title: A YAP – TEAD – CTCF Transcriptional Regulatory Axis Associated With the Elimination of Injured Hepatocytes From the Liver

doi: 10.1111/gtc.70150

Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptome analyses of livers and hepatocytes following YAP induction by AAV or HTVi. (a) Schematic overview of the RNA‐seq workflow for whole liver RNA‐seq (left) and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq (right). For sorted RNA‐seq, hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase perfusion and hepatocyte fractionation, followed by purification of live hepatocytes and FACS sorting of tdTomato‐positive hepatocytes. Liver tissues or sorted hepatocytes were collected 3 days after YAP induction and subjected to RNA‐seq analysis. (b) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of whole liver RNA‐seq data using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (c) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in whole liver RNA‐seq. (d) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering heatmap of sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq data using DEGs across the indicated groups (No treatment, HTVi‐empty, HTVi‐YAP, and AAV‐YAP). Red and blue indicate relatively high and low expression, respectively. (e) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated genes (fold change > 2, p < 0.05) in the AAV‐YAP and HTVi‐YAP groups compared with the no‐treatment control group in sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq. (f) Venn diagram showing the overlap of HTVi‐specifically upregulated genes between whole RNA‐seq analysis and sort RNA‐seq analysis. (g) Reactome pathway analysis of genes commonly upregulated in the HTVi‐YAP group in both whole liver and sorted hepatocyte RNA‐seq datasets. The x ‐axis indicates −log10 (adjusted p value), dot size represents gene count, and color intensity indicates z‐score. (h–j) qPCR validation of representative genes associated with the indicated Reactome pathway terms: Cell cycle checkpoints (h), RHO GTPase effectors (i), and Immunoregulatory interactions between a lymphoid and a nonlymphoid cell (j). Relative mRNA expression was normalized to Gapdh . Data are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3).

Article Snippet: cDNA was synthesized using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan).

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Isolation, Fractionation, Purification, Analysis, Expressing, Control, Biomarker Discovery